251
taken before the Council.
3.
The details of the case are so fully explained in the various documents referred to above, that it seems to me unnecessary to further enter into them.
4. Your Lordship will observe that the Council came to the conclusion, in which I concurred, that Mr. Freire had been guilty of neglect in the performance of his duty, but that taking into consideration the unsatisfactory manner in which the business of the Money Order Office was carried on, the full penalty of suspension should not be inflicted.
5. I have, therefore, with the advice of the Council, and subject to Your Lordship's approval, imposed the minor punishment of reduction, as explained in my Despatch
251
taken before the Council.
3.
The details of the -
case are so
fully explained
in the various documents
referred
is
to above, that it
me to
unnecessary for further enter into them.
4
Your Lordship will
observe that the Council.
came to the conclusion, in which I concurred, that Mr. Freire had been
quilty of neglect in the performance of.
his
duty
but
Q
#
but that taking in
consideration the unsatisfactory
manner in which the
business of the Money Order
Office
was carried on, that
the full penalty of suspension should not be inflicted.
I have, therefore,
5.
with the advice of the Connoil, and subject to Your Lordship's approval, imposed the minor - punishment of reduction,
explained in
and, as
in my
Despatch
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.